Insights and Analysis
AI-washing – when AI hype becomes a litigation risk
AI-washing – when AI hype becomes a litigation risk
Earlier this week, the Federal Trade Commission sent more than $18 million in refunds to U.S. consumers who entered a Publishers Clearing House (PCH) sweepstakes in recent years. The refund represents a significant remedy to consumers in the sweepstakes scenario, and a warning to companies that intentionally unclear or deceptive marketing practices — including misleading prize promotions and conditions of entry — can result in serious legal consequences and financial penalties.
The FTC’s complaint, in a lawsuit filed in 2023, alleged that PCH used “deceptive and unfair” practices and “dark patterns” to make consumers believe that entering the sweepstakes required a purchase or that purchasing a product would increase the odds of winning. The FTC also charged PCH with deceptive practices on the basis that PCH did not disclose its shipping and handling fees and misrepresented its policies on selling users’ personal data.
Sweepstakes are also subject to scrutiny on the state level, and companies should be mindful of state-based lottery laws and state consumer protection laws. While state laws vary, general guidelines for compliance with federal and state sweepstakes laws are:
Authored by Meryl Bernstein and Rachel Shelbourne.